business crime education Games Health News Politics

AP FACT CHECK: Trump plays on immigration myths

AP FACT CHECK: Trump plays on immigration myths

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has lengthy railed towards immigration as a scourge on the financial system and national security. He’s committed his administration to starting development on a wall alongside the Mexican border to stop illegal immigration and asylum seekers, yet he reversed his past coverage efforts on proscribing legal immigration in this yr’s State of the Union handle.

Trump managed to accuse immigrants in the nation illegally of stealing jobs from American staff, whereas declaring that the nation wants more immigrants because of its financial growth. This argument rested on a collection of false stereotypes.

“I want people to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally,” he declared, solely to say later, “Working-class Americans are left to pay the price for mass illegal immigration: reduced jobs, lower wages, overburdened schools, hospitals that are so crowded you can’t get in, increased crime, and a depleted social safety net.”

That’s a slight variation on his drumbeat going again to 2015, when he declared: “They’re taking our jobs, they’re taking our manufacturing jobs, they’re taking our money, they’re killing us.”

The very fact is that 75 % of immigrants arrived legally, in response to the Pew Analysis Middle. Usually, the whole immigrant population is more and more higher educated than native-born People.

They’re more more likely to have jobs. They’re much less more likely to commit violent crimes. They assist gasoline financial progress. And as a gaggle over time, they’re no extra a drain on taxpayers than native-born citizens.

Furthermore, for all the attention to the southern border, in recent times immigrants to the U.S. have been more more likely to come from Asia than from Mexico.

Three Harvard College economists launched a paper in June that checked out immigration in multiple nations and concluded that native-born People as an entire wildly overestimate the prevalence of immigrants. These People estimated, on average, that legal immigrants made up 36 % of the U.S. population, greater than triple their precise share. They thought that immigrants have been less more likely to work and more dependent on government assist than immigrants truly are — and these stereotypes made them much less supportive of social packages which may assist immigrants.

“We were surprised by how much of a misperception there was about the level of education, income and contribution to society that immigrants give,” stated Alberto Alesini, a Harvard economist who co-wrote the paper.

Listed here are some elementary myths about U.S. immigration and the financial system:



REALITY: Not likely.

The web movement of all migration into america in recent times — around zero.3 % of the entire population — is roughly at a long-standing historical common, in response to an analysis of presidency knowledge by Lyman Stone, an economist who studies demographic issues.

“It isn’t rock-bottom, but it isn’t that high either,” Stone stated.

Economists say that proscribing immigration would in all probability weaken economic progress. Given in the present day’s lower start rates in america, immigrants are more and more wanted to maintain a degree of population progress for the U.S. financial system to maintain increasing.

Immigrants as an entire do make up a larger proportion of the full U.S. inhabitants than they did again in 1970, having grown from less than 5 % of the inhabitants to greater than 13 % now.

But there’s a largely ignored purpose for that: Native-born People are having fewer youngsters. The falling delivery price signifies that immigrants now make up a larger share of the inhabitants. In 2030, it’s projected that immigrants will turn into the first driver for U.S. inhabitants progress, overtaking U.S. births.



REALITY: Many individuals have firsthand tales of dropping a development bid or an office job to a overseas worker. This occurs in an financial system as giant and numerous as the USA’, where quite a few individuals additionally lose jobs to native-born People.

However employment knowledge recommend that the influx of immigrants helps improve general hiring for the U.S. financial system moderately than erode job progress. The development is obvious in the authorities’s monthly jobs report. The info doesn’t distinguish between immigrants who are in the U.S. legally and illegally.

Almost 64 % of immigrants maintain jobs, in contrast with roughly 60 % of staff born in america, in line with the Labor Division. Last yr, immigrants accounted for roughly 40 % of the 2.4 million jobs added.

As a result of a gentle progress in the workforce helps the financial system broaden, economists say fewer immigrants would equal slower progress and fewer jobs. Falling start rates and the retirement of the huge era of child boomers imply fewer individuals will stream into the workforce in the coming years — a drag on financial progress, which can, in flip, in all probability limit hiring.

Many economists have noted that adding immigrants would assist keep the move of staff into the financial system and help progress.



REALITY: The president has pledged to create an immigration system based mostly on “merit,” thereby implying that america is a vacation spot primarily of unskilled and uneducated staff.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Trump stated at his 2015 marketing campaign kickoff.

However at present’s immigrants are more likely to be better educated than People. And the country has increasingly develop into a magnet for foreigners with doctorates and grasp’s levels. Sixteen % of all immigrants who arrived since 2000 maintain a complicated degree, compared with 13 % of the native-born population, in response to the Census Bureau.

As of 2017, immigrants who have develop into residents are virtually twice as more likely to hold a doctorate than are native-born U.S. residents. Overseas-born residents have been more more likely to have a doctorate no less than way back to 2000.

And Census data additionally present that the youngsters of immigrants are more likely to graduate from school than are these of native-born parentage.

This doesn’t imply, in fact, that each one immigrants are higher educated. Such are the disparities inside the immigrant inhabitants that immigrants as an entire are less doubtless than native-born People to have completed high school. However the development exhibits that the USA is increasingly a house for foreigners with graduate degrees and better earnings.



REALITY: The load of the research suggests that immigrants have not suppressed wages.

David Card, an economist on the College of California at Berkeley, first studied the difficulty in 1990 by reviewing the arrival of Cuban migrants in Miami through the 1980 “Mariel boat lift.” This historical rush of immigrants created a natural experiment to measure what then happened to incomes within the local area. He concluded: “The influx appears to have had virtually no effect on the wages or unemployment rates of less-skilled workers.”

Giovanni Peri, an economist on the College of California at Davis, studied immigration into California between 1960 and 2005. He wrote in a 2010 paper that it had “essentially” no impact on wages or employment of native-born staff.

But many individuals in search of to scale back immigration rely on analysis from George Borjas, a Harvard economist. His analysis discovered that the arrival of Cubans within the Mariel boat carry induced wages to fall for native-born high school dropouts in Miami. Other economists have questioned his methodology.

In addition, Borjas’ findings would apply to a small fraction of U.S. jobholders at the moment, solely about 6.2 % of whom lack a high school diploma.

Different explanations for sluggish wage progress transcend immigration. They embrace the decline in unionization, an intensified push to maximize corporate income, growing medical insurance prices that supplant wages and the rise of a lower-wage international labor drive that in an intertwined worldwide financial system can hinder pay progress for People.



REALITY: The Nationwide Academy of Sciences explored the prices to taxpayers in 2016. It’s a difficult problem. The federal authorities runs a finances deficit, which suggests it spends more than it collects in taxes. Because of this, on common, most People are a internet drain on taxpayers.

All informed, the costs imposed by immigrants are about the identical as they are for native-born residents.

“An immigrant and a native-born person with similar characteristics will likely have the same fiscal impact,” the report stated.

But the report also examined spending by states and localities, which usually should keep balanced budgets. Because state and local governments supply a lot of the money for public faculties, immigrants typically receive extra in benefits than they pay in taxes.

That stated, there are longer-term advantages from educating youngsters, who develop into adults who get jobs, purchase automobiles, buy houses and pay taxes and thereby contribute to financial progress. The Nationwide Academy discovered that the web value from 2011 to 2013 for state and local budgets combined averaged $1,600 a yr for a first-generation immigrant. But that determine turned a internet constructive of $1,700 for the second era and $1,300 for the third.

Immigrant households with youngsters are usually more doubtless to make use of welfare packages like meals help and Medicaid than native-born households, largely because the immigrant families have lower average incomes and bigger households, in accordance with the National Academy report.



REALITY: Trump ceaselessly highlights violence by the “savage” MS-13 gang, saying in his speech Tuesday that it operates in at the very least 20 states and “they almost all come through our southern border.”

He invokes that gang, whose members come predominantly from El Salvador or are U.S. citizens descended from there, to painting immigrants as criminals. Widespread crime makes it more durable, in fact, to run a enterprise, spend cash and have interaction in the day by day transactions that hold an financial system humming.

But there’s scant evidence that immigrants are perpetuating a criminal offense wave. In a paper revealed last yr, sociologists Michael Mild and Ty Miller reviewed crime in every state and the District of Columbia from 1990 to 2014. They discovered that a rising number of immigrants in the country illegally corresponded with a drop, not an increase, in reported crime.

The authors acknowledged that it’s potential that people who got here illegally are less more likely to report a criminal offense. However the authors also observe that such immigrants overwhelmingly arrived to work, a development that helps to scale back crime levels. Previous analysis cited in their paper discovered that 93 % of the lads in the country illegally either have a job or are on the lookout for one.

“At a minimum, the results of our study call into question claims that undocumented immigration increases violent crime,” their paper concluded. “If anything, the data suggest the opposite.”


Find AP Reality Checks at

Comply with @APFactCheck on Twitter:

immigrants to the U.S. at the moment are more more likely to come from Asia than from Mexico or Latin America.

EDITOR’S NOTE _ A take a look at the veracity of claims by political figures

if (typeof(window.bgmpGdpr) !== ‘undefined’ && !window.bgmpGdpr.isOptedOut())
n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)
fbq(‘init’, ‘813236348753005’);
fbq(‘monitor’, “PageView”);